| Benford, F (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78, 551-572. |
 |
|
|
|
| Berton, L (1995). He’s Got Their Number: Scholar Uses Math to Foil Financial Fraud. The Wall Street Journal, pg B1, July 10. |
 |
|
|
|
| Boyle, J (1994). An Application of Fourier Series to the Most Significant Digit Problem. American Mathematical Monthly 101(9), 879-886. ISSN:0002-9890. |
 |
|
|
|
| Browne, MW (1998). Following Benford’s law, or looking out for no. 1. The New York Times, August 4, 1998. |
 |
|
|
|
| Carslaw, CAPN (1988). Anomalies in Income Numbers: Evidence of Goal Oriented Behavior. The Accounting Review 63, No. 2, 321-327. |
 |
|
|
|
| Christian, CW and Gupta, S (1993). New evidence on "Secondary Evasion". The Journal of the American Taxation Association 15, 72-93. |
 |
|
|
|
| Cohen, DIA (1976). An Explanation of the First Digit Phenomenon. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 20(3), 367-370. ISSN:0097-3165. |
 |
|
|
|
| Dominguez, MP and Burguillo, JDA (1999). El primer digito significativo. Revista Epsilon de la S.A.E.M. "Thales", 45 (15/3), 339-352. |
 |
|
|
|
| Flehinger, BJ (1966). On the Probability that a Random Integer has Initial Digit A. American Mathematical Monthly 73(10), 1056-1061. ISSN:0002-9890. |
 |
|
|
|
| Furry, WH and Hurwitz, H (1945). Distribution of numbers and distribution of significant figures. Nature 155(3924), 52-53. |
 |
|
|
|
| Goudsmit, SA and Furry, WH (1944). Significant figures of numbers in statistical tables. Nature 154(3921), 800-801. ISSN:0028-0836. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hamming, R (1970). On the distribution of numbers. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 49(8), 1609-1625. ISSN:0005-8580. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hill, TP (1995). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 10(4), 354-363. ISSN:0883-4237. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hill, TP (1996). A note on distributions of true versus fabricated data. Perceptual and Motor Skills 83, 776-778 Part 1. ISSN:0031-5215. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hill, TP (1997). Benford law. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Supplement, vol. 1, 102-103. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hill, TP (1998). The First-Digit Phenomenon. American Scientist 86 (4), 358-363. ISSN:0003-0996. |
 |
|
|
|
| Hill, TP (1999). The difficulty of faking data. Chance 12(3), 27-31. |
 |
|
|
|
| Maney, K. (2000). Baffled by math? Wait 'til I tell you about Benford's Law. USA today, 18 October 2000. |
 |
|
|
|
| Newcomb, S (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics 4(1), 39-40. ISSN:0002-9327. |
 |
|
|
|
| Nigrini, MJ (1994). Using digital frequencies to detect fraud. Fraud Magazine, The White Paper Index 8(2), 3-6. |
 |
|
|
|
| Nigrini, MJ (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association 18(1), 72-91. |
 |
|
|
|
| Nigrini, MJ (2000). Digital Analysis Using Benford's Law: Tests Statistics for Auditors. Global Audit Publications, Vancouver, Canada. |
 |
|
|
|
| Pinkham, RS (1961). On the Distribution of First Significant Digits. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32(4), 1223-1230. ISSN:0003-4851. |
 |
|
|
|
| Raimi, RA (1969). The Peculiar Distribution of First Digits. Scientific American 221(6), 109-119. ISSN:0036-8733. |
 |
|
|
|
| Raimi, RA (1969). On Distribution of First Significant Figures. American Mathematical Monthly 76(4), 342-348. ISSN:0002-9890. |
 |
|
|
|
| Varian, HR (1972). Benford’s law. The American Statistician 26(3), 65-66. |
 |
|
|
|