Benford, F (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 78, No. 4 (Mar. 31, 1938), pp. 551-572.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 10(4), pp. 354-363. ISSN/ISBN:0883-4237.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1999). The difficulty of faking data. Chance 12(3), pp. 27-31. DOI:10.1080/09332480.1999.10542154.
|
|
|
|
|
Murphy, J, Baxter, R, Eyerman, J, Cunningham, D and Kennet, J (2004). A system for detecting interviewer falsification. RTI International at 59th Annual AAPOR Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association 18(1), pp. 72-91.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ (1999). I’ve got your number. Journal of Accountancy 187(5), pp. 79-83.
|
|
|
|
|
Saville, A (2006). Using Benford's law to detect data error and fraud: an examination of companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 9(3), 341-354. ISSN/ISBN:1015-8812.
|
|
|
|
|
Schräpler, J-P and Wagner, GG (2003). Identification, characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys. An analysis by means of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEP. IZA Discussion paper no. 969. Also published as DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research) discussion paper 392, December 2003 - online at www.diw-berlin.de/documents/publikationen/73/41110/dp392.pdf.
|
|
|
|
|
Scott, PD and Fasli, M (2001). Benford’s law: an empirical investigation and a novel explanation. CSM Technical Report 349, Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, UK.
|
|
|
|
|
Swanson, D, Cho, MJ and Eltinge, J (2003). Detecting possibly fraudulent or error-prone survey data using Benford’s law. pp 4172-4177 in: 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings - Section on Survey Research Methods, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
|
|
|
|
|