Adhikari, AK and Sarkar, BP (1968). Distribution of most significant digit in certain functions whose arguments are random variables. Sankhya-The Indian Journal of Statistics Series B, no. 30, pp. 47-58. ISSN/ISBN:0581-5738.
|
|
|
|
|
Benford, F (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 78, No. 4 (Mar. 31, 1938), pp. 551-572.
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan, RL (1969). Note on the initial digit problem. Fibonacci Quarterly 7(5), pp. 474-475.
|
|
|
|
|
Durtschi, C, Hillison, W and Pacini, C (2004). The effective use of Benford’s law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting 1524-5586/Vol. V, pp. 17-34.
|
|
|
|
|
Fewster, RM (2009). A Simple Explanation of Benford's Law. American Statistician 63(1), pp. 26-32. DOI:10.1198/tast.2009.0005.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). The Significant-Digit Phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly 102(4), pp. 322-327. DOI:10.2307/2974952.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 10(4), pp. 354-363. ISSN/ISBN:0883-4237.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). Base-Invariance Implies Benford's Law. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 123(3), pp. 887-895. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9939. DOI:10.2307/2160815.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1998). The First-Digit Phenomenon. American Scientist 86 (4), pp. 358-363. ISSN/ISBN:0003-0996. DOI:10.1511/1998.4.358.
|
|
|
|
|
Ley, E (1996). On the Peculiar Distribution of the US Stock Indexes' Digits. American Statistician 50(4), pp. 311-313. ISSN/ISBN:0003-1305. DOI:10.1080/00031305.1996.10473558.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Detecting Newcomb-Benford digital frequency anomalies in the audit context: Suggested x^2 test possibilities. Accounting and Finance Research 3(2), pp. 191-205. DOI:10.5430/afr.v3n2p191.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Using the Benford Datasets and the Reddy and Sebastin Results to Form an Audit Alert Screening Heuristic: An Appraisal. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, vol. XIII, issue 3, pp. 56-69.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Test of Proportions Screening for the Newcomb-Benford Screen in the Audit Context: A Likelihood Triaging Protocol. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research 3(4), pp. 166-180. DOI:10.5430/afr.v3n4p166.
|
|
|
|
|
Newcomb, S (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics 4(1), pp. 39-40. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9327. DOI:10.2307/2369148.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association 18(1), pp. 72-91.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ and Mittermaier, LJ (1997). The use of Benford's Law as an aid in analytical procedures. Auditing - A Journal of Practice & Theory 16(2), 52-67. ISSN/ISBN:0278-0380.
|
|
|
|
|
Pinkham, RS (1961). On the Distribution of First Significant Digits. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32(4), pp. 1223-1230. ISSN/ISBN:0003-4851.
|
|
|
|
|
Raimi, RA (1969). The Peculiar Distribution of First Digits. Scientific American 221(6), pp. 109-120. ISSN/ISBN:0036-8733. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1269-109.
|
|
|
|
|
Ross, KA (2011). Benford's Law, a growth industry. American Mathematical Monthly 118 (7), pp. 571-583. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9890. DOI:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.118.07.571.
|
|
|
|
|