This work cites the following items of the Benford Online Bibliography:
Benford, F (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 78, No. 4 (Mar. 31, 1938), pp. 551-572. | ||||
Bredl, S, Winker, P and Kötschau, K (2012). A statistical approach to detect interviewer falsification of survey data. Survey Methodology, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-10. | ||||
Diekmann, A (2007). Not the First Digit! Using Benford's Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientific Data. Journal of Applied Statistics 34(3), pp. 321-329. ISSN/ISBN:0266-4763. DOI:10.1080/02664760601004940. | ||||
Diekmann, A and Jann, B (2010). Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection: Facts and Legends. German Economic Review 11(3), pp. 397–401. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2010.00510.x. | ||||
Hill, TP (1995). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 10(4), pp. 354-363. ISSN/ISBN:0883-4237. | ||||
Judge, G and Schechter, L (2009). Detecting problems in survey data using Benford’s law. J. Human Resources 44, pp. 1-24. DOI:10.3368/jhr.44.1.1. | ||||
Murphy, J, Baxter, R, Eyerman, J, Cunningham, D and Kennet, J (2004). A system for detecting interviewer falsification. RTI International at 59th Annual AAPOR Conference, Phoenix, Arizona. | ||||
Newcomb, S (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics 4(1), pp. 39-40. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9327. DOI:10.2307/2369148. | ||||
Nigrini, MJ (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association 18(1), pp. 72-91. | ||||
Nigrini, MJ (1999). I’ve got your number. Journal of Accountancy 187(5), pp. 79-83. | ||||
Porras, J and English, N (2004). Data-Driven Approaches to Identifying Interviewer Falsification: The Case of Health Surveys. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, pp. 4223-4228. | ||||
Schräpler, J-P (2010). Benford's Law as an instrument for fraud detection in surveys using the data of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) paper No. 273, March 2, 2010. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1562574. | ||||
Schräpler, J-P and Wagner, GG (2003). Identification, characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys. An analysis by means of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEP. IZA Discussion paper no. 969. Also published as DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research) discussion paper 392, December 2003 - online at www.diw-berlin.de/documents/publikationen/73/41110/dp392.pdf. | ||||
Schräpler, J-P and Wagner, GG (2005). Characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys – An analysis of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEP. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 89, pp. 7-20. ISSN/ISBN:0002-6018. DOI:10.1007/s101820500188. | ||||
Scott, PD and Fasli, M (2001). Benford’s law: an empirical investigation and a novel explanation. CSM Technical Report 349, Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, UK. | ||||
Swanson, D, Cho, MJ and Eltinge, J (2003). Detecting possibly fraudulent or error-prone survey data using Benford’s law. pp 4172-4177 in: 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings - Section on Survey Research Methods, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. | ||||
Tödter, K-H (2007). Das Benford-Gesetz und die Anfangsziffern von Aktienkursen. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 36(2), pp. 93-97. DOI:10.15358/0340-1650-2007-2-93. GER | ||||
Wang, Y and Pedlow, S (2005). Detecting Falsified Cases in SCF 2004 Using Benford’s Law. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, pp. 3562-3657. |