Benford, FA (2017). Base Dependence of Benford Random Variables. Preprint arXiv:1702.01644 [math.GM]; last accessed Aug 9, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
Cho, WKT and Gaines, BJ (2007). Breaking the (Benford) law: Statistical fraud detection in campaign finance. American Statistician 61(3), pp. 218-223. ISSN/ISBN:0003-1305. DOI:10.1198/000313007X223496.
|
|
|
|
|
Fewster, RM (2009). A Simple Explanation of Benford's Law. American Statistician 63(1), pp. 26-32. DOI:10.1198/tast.2009.0005.
|
|
|
|
|
Geyer, CL and Williamson, PP (2004). Detecting Fraud in Data Sets Using Benford's Law. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 33(1), pp. 229-246. ISSN/ISBN:0361-0918. DOI:10.1081/SAC-120028442.
|
|
|
|
|
Hickman, MJ and Rice, SK (2010). Digital Analysis of Crime Statistics: Does Crime Conform to Benford’s Law?. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26(3), pp. 333-349. ISSN/ISBN:1573-7799. DOI:10.1007/s10940-010-9094-6.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). The Significant-Digit Phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly 102(4), pp. 322-327. DOI:10.2307/2974952.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 10(4), pp. 354-363. ISSN/ISBN:0883-4237.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1995). Base-Invariance Implies Benford's Law. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 123(3), pp. 887-895. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9939. DOI:10.2307/2160815.
|
|
|
|
|
Hill, TP (1998). The First-Digit Phenomenon. American Scientist 86 (4), pp. 358-363. ISSN/ISBN:0003-0996. DOI:10.1511/1998.4.358.
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly, C (2011). Benford's Law to the Rescue. Internal Auditor, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 25-27 .
|
|
|
|
|
Ley, E (1996). On the Peculiar Distribution of the US Stock Indexes' Digits. American Statistician 50(4), pp. 311-313. ISSN/ISBN:0003-1305. DOI:10.1080/00031305.1996.10473558.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Detecting Newcomb-Benford digital frequency anomalies in the audit context: Suggested x^2 test possibilities. Accounting and Finance Research 3(2), pp. 191-205. DOI:10.5430/afr.v3n2p191.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Using the Benford Datasets and the Reddy and Sebastin Results to Form an Audit Alert Screening Heuristic: An Appraisal. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, vol. XIII, issue 3, pp. 56-69.
|
|
|
|
|
Lusk, EJ and Halperin, M (2014). Detecting Digital Frequency Anomalies as Benchmarked against the Newcomb-Benford Theoretical Frequencies: Calibrating the Chi2 Test: A Note. International Business Research 7(2). ISSN/ISBN:1913-9012. DOI:10.5539/ibr.v7n2p72 .
|
|
|
|
|
Newcomb, S (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics 4(1), pp. 39-40. ISSN/ISBN:0002-9327. DOI:10.2307/2369148.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxation Association 18(1), pp. 72-91.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigrini, MJ (1999). I’ve got your number. Journal of Accountancy 187(5), pp. 79-83.
|
|
|
|
|
Rauch, B, Brähler, G, Engel, S and Göttsche, M (2011). Fact and Fiction in EU-Governmental Economic Data. German Economic Review 12(3), pp. 243-255. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00542.x.
|
|
|
|
|