CREDIT Research Paper 19/02; published (2020) in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 172, pp. 314–343.
ISSN/ISBN: Not available at this time. DOI: Not available at this time.
Abstract: Recent high-profile scandals related to misuse of funding and donations have raised the demand for scrutiny over financial transparency and operational activities of non-profit organizations in developed countries. Our analysis challenges the common practice in the sector of using programme ratios and overhead costs as indicators for non-profit accountability. Using Benford's Law to measure irregularities in financial data for a large sample of public charities we estimate that 25% of the sample potentially misreport their financial information. We show theoretically and empirically that charities with a higher programme ratio (their level of spending on charitable activities), will be less likely to misreport their financial information only when their overhead costs (spending on governing activities) are also sufficiently high. Tighter monitoring becomes ineffective in increasing the sectoral transparency and accountability unless accompanied by a sufficiently high charitable spending.
Bibtex:
@techReport{,
AUTHOR = {Canh Thien Dang and Trudy Owens},
TITLE = {Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities},
INSTITUTION = {Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham},
YEAR = {2019},
NUMBER = {19/02},
URL = {https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/2019/19-02.pdf},
NOTE = {last accessed Jun 7, 2019},
}
Reference Type: Technical Report
Subject Area(s): Accounting